Passing the Smell Test
IT'S THE MESSAGE NO LANDFILL wants to receive. Recently, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Boston, issued a notice of non-compliance to a construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfill for its failure to control odor. According to the notice, the decomposition of C&D debris was causing the release of odor-causing hydrogen sulfide (H
Unless the C&D landfill figures out what to do about the odor, it may have to stop collecting construction debris altogether — a fate that is facing C&D recyclers and landfills all across the country.
In Ohio, for example, thousands of tons of C&D debris, leftover from the recycling process, have been rail-hauled to the Buckeye state from the Northeast, often at a substantial savings in tipping fees. Yet several landfills that accept the C&D waste are receiving numerous citizen complaints about H
In New Hampshire, for example, complaints about sulfuric odor were so numerous that, in July 2004, the state banned the use of C&D fines as a daily cover. Concerned about the effects on the C&D recycling industry, the Construction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA), Eola, Ill., participated in a working group to develop a set of best management practices (BMPs) for the use of C&D fines in New Hampshire landfills. The BMPs may now serve as a national model .
“The BMPs allow us to continue to provide this product to the landfill industry,” says William Turley, executive director of CMRA. “C&D recyclers should keep trying to get better-value products for what they're bringing in. But there's always going to be a level of material that's leftover, so there needs to be an outlet for it.”
Paying the Fines
Without question, the C&D recycling market has gained steam in recent years. Depending on the region, C&D debris comprises an estimated 25 to 45 percent of North American waste, and up to 25 percent of that waste is recycled, according to CMRA. As debris is processed through a typical system of grinders and screeners, it leaves behind a significant portion of “fines,” those ¼-inch to 3-inch pieces that are byproducts of the recycling process. C&D fines typically are made up of sand, dirt, asphalt, gypsum, organics and other material.
C&D fines have been used as an ADC material at landfills since the 1980s. Using fines can have several positive benefits for landfills. Depending on the site conditions, fines can shed water, resist erosion, be easily spread and prevent fire if the organic content is low enough, among other benefits. But C&D fines also can contain a large portion of gypsum, the primary component in drywall, which can produce hydrogen sulfide gas.
Generally, H
“This is not a new issue,” says Timothy Townsend, an associate professor at the University of Florida's Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Fla. “We've known for a number of years that drywall in a landfill can result in hydrogen sulfide formation. More recently, with the growth of the C&D debris recycling industry, there's been a continued need to find markets for the products of those operations [such as ADC]. In the Northeast, there have been landfills that have hydrogen sulfide odors that have been attributed to ADC use. It's caused some people to step back and say, ‘maybe this is not what we want.’”
With a team of researchers, Townsend is developing uniform testing protocols to determine the levels of gypsum in C&D debris, a first step in the creation of nationwide BMPs. “There is no good testing protocol to determine the amount of gypsum in the C&D debris,” Townsend says. “You might get extremely variable results from place to place. We're developing a standard operating procedure to get reliable estimates on the amount of gypsum that's in an alternative daily cover. We're hoping to ultimately answer the question of ‘how much matters’ in the development of hydrogen sulfide.”
Interim Steps
Although the University of Florida's research is ongoing, it did not preclude the C&D recycling industry from developing interim BMPs to deal with the hydrogen sulfide issue in New Hampshire. With leadership from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services in Concord, the work group was composed of C&D recyclers, landfill operators, academics and CMRA, represented by its New England chapter.
In New Hampshire, solid waste officials saw that C&D fines were not affording the benefits that they have in other locations. “It didn't shed water very well, and it didn't hold gas in very well,” says Mike Sills, chief engineer of the state's Waste Management Division. “We set up a pretty large work group and developed pilot programs at one of the C&D processing facilities to nail down which combinations of soil and coal ash would keep down the formation of this gas.”
A key motivator for the group was cutting through the many assumptions that were being made about H
To develop the BMPs, CMRA worked with its member-companies LL&S, Salem, N.H., and ERRCO Recycling, Epping, N.H., to develop fines formulations that could be used in landfills without any significant production of H
The working group developed five standard operating procedures when using C&D fines as ADC or for grading and shaping:
gypsum removal prior to processing or transfer;
disposal of bulk gypsum in one area;
mixing the ADC with soil;
mixing the ADC with ash (coal or wood ash); and
educating recyclers and landfill operators about the sulfur cycle in landfills.
Removing gypsum from C&D fines is the optimal way to reduce the likelihood of H
“In the real world, it's impossible to remove all the gypsum, because when you get this debris, it's often all ground up,” says Terry Bauer, chief operating officer of Green Seal Environmental, Sandwich, Mass., and CMRA's New England representative in the BMP working group. “You're always going to get the potential for H
The interim BMPs recommend that the sulfate concentration in fines be determined and its gas and water infiltration sealing abilities verified, so that the material can be used alone as an ADC without excessive H
Building Blocks
Probably the most important BMP, according to the New Hampshire working group, is educating recyclers, transfer station operators and landfill operators about the sulfur cycle in landfills. “When these groups of people are aware of the mechanisms that result in the production of H
Already, at least two New Hampshire landfills have adopted the interim BMPs successfully. “The interim BMPs are rather general in nature and rely on a good-faith effort by the industry, the processors and the landfill operators to implement them correctly,” Guilfoy says. “We find that that's working. The processors don't want to be blamed for [odors], and neither do the landfill owners.”
CMRA and its partners also are working with other states and industry groups to develop nationwide standards for the use of C&D fines in landfills. Turley also urges the solid waste industry to look beyond C&D material. For example, the disposal of sludge in landfills might also be a significant cause of hydrogen sulfide generation, he says. Also, the University of Florida expects to confirm its standard gypsum testing proposal this spring.
As a result of such efforts, C&D recyclers and landfill operators may once again enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship without anyone raising a stink about hydrogen sulfide. “This is a vital outlet for the material C&D recyclers produce,” Bauer says. “There needs to be some beneficial use for this material, or else these facilities are not worth operating. The BMPs have widespread application across the country.”
Kim A. O'Connell is a Waste Age contributing editor based in Arlington, Va.
| Conditions | Specifics |
|---|---|
| pH | Between 4 and 9 (optimum) |
| Temperature | Between 30° C and 38° C (optimum) |
| Absence of Air | Anaerobic (no oxygen) |
| Food Source | Sulfate ions |
| Water | Moist or wet |
| Carbon Source | Wood, paper, glue, etc. |
| Source: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services | |
| Conditions | Recommended Standard Range |
|---|---|
| Particle Size | Up to 2" |
| Organic Content | Up to 35% |
| Sulfate Content | Up to 60,000 mg/Kg |
| Source: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services | |
| • Gypsum removal prior to processing or transfer |
| • Disposal of bulk gypsum in one area |
| • Mixing the ADC with soil |
| • Mixing the ADC with ash (coal or wood ash) |
| • Education regarding the sulfur cycle in landfills |
| Source: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services |
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.
Most Recent Story
Thermostat Recycling
June 20, 2007
The Thermostat Recycling Corp., Rossyln, Va., and the Product Stewardship Institute (PSI) Inc., Boston, have announced the creation of a nationwide...








May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007