Landfill Pros and Cons


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines

Upholding a lower court ruling, the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court has determined that landfill operators must create a “harms and benefits” list when proposing new or expanded landfills, according to an article in The Clarion News newspaper. The test became mandatory for municipal solid waste landfills in 2000, the paper says.

The “harms and benefits” list must examine the impact a landfill project will have on surrounding communities as well as its environmental, social and economic benefits, the paper says.

“The Supreme Court's decision is a huge win for the people of Pennsylvania,” said Kathleen McGinty, secretary of the state's Department of Environmental Protection, to The Clarion News. “The harms-benefits test gives residents a voice in the permitting process and ensures their communities will garner benefits when they host landfills.”



Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.


Most Recent Story

Thermostat Recycling

June 20, 2007

The Thermostat Recycling Corp., Rossyln, Va., and the Product Stewardship Institute (PSI) Inc., Boston, have announced the creation of a nationwide...

-->

Current Issue

Issue Cover View Issue
Subscribe
Subscribe to
Digital Edition

This month’s issue includes the 15th annual Waste Age 100, our ranking of the largest solid waste and recycling firms. Also in this issue, a discussion of the challenges facing MRFs, a report on the latest waste industry safety statistics, and a survey of environmentally-friendly compactors and balers.


ATE logo
Become an Expert
A panel of professionals answers your questions on a variety of topics.

Steve GoodierTopic: Lubricants

Steve Goodier
Director of Technology



Back to Top

Browse Back Issues

Browse Back Issues