Up and Down


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines  

Two of the top five solid waste importing states are heading in opposite directions. According to statistics released by each state's environmental department, the volume of waste imported into Virginia continues to increase, while Wisconsin's waste imports are in a steady decline.

A Congressional Research Service report released in June ranks states based on their levels of imported waste. Virginia ranked behind only Pennsylvania for second on the list, while Wisconsin finished fourth. The rankings used statistics from 2005 because 2006 data from every state was not available at the time. The top-five is rounded out by Michigan in third place and Oregon in fifth.

Meanwhile, Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources (DNR) released annual reports compiled using 2006 statistics. The Virginia DEQ reports that the total waste received increased nearly 3.5 percent to 7.3 million tons, up from 7 million tons in 2005. Since 2000, annual imports have increased by approximately 2.7 million tons, and have increased each year except 2005.

The Wisconsin DNR reports that 1.9 million tons were imported in 2006, which continues the decline from 2.1 million tons in 2005 and 2.2 million tons in 2004.

The Virginia DEQ has forecasted 17.3 years of remaining capacity for municipal solid waste in the state's landfills at the current disposal rate. Construction and demolition debris landfills have a reported 8.9 years of capacity remaining. As for Wisconsin, statistics from the DNR show that there are 12.4 years of capacity remaining for municipal and industrial waste at the current disposal rate.

Virginia received the bulk of its 2006 imported waste from Maryland, which accounted for roughly 43 percent, according to the DEQ annual report. Wisconsin's biggest contributor last year was Illinois, accounting for nearly 64 percent of the state's imported waste, according to the DNR report.

Dennis Mack, recycling and solid waste section chief for the Wisconsin DNR, notes that the downward trend isn't the result of a deliberate policy change. Instead, he says it is more closely tied to general economic conditions, fuel prices and internal decisions by waste companies on how they will utilize their regional airspace.




Commenting terms of use blog comments powered by Disqus

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.


Most Recent Story

Thermostat Recycling

June 20, 2007

The Thermostat Recycling Corp., Rossyln, Va., and the Product Stewardship Institute (PSI) Inc., Boston, have announced the creation of a nationwide...

-->

Current Issue

Issue Cover View Issue
Subscribe
Subscribe to
Digital Edition

Waste Age unveils its redesign this month with a cover story on New York City’s push to transport more of its waste by rail. Also in this issue: Texas haulers respond to Hurricane Ike and an examination of conversions to single-stream recycling.


ATE logo
Become an Expert
A panel of professionals answers your questions on a variety of topics.

Steve GoodierTopic: Lubricants

Steve Goodier
Director of Technology



Newsletters

Waste Age Wire

Waste Age Online Show Daily

Subscribe to Our Newsletters

Back to Top

Browse Back Issues

Browse Back Issues